3.22.2006

vagabond

Hawaii still sucks.

I'm sure it was cool back when the Hawaiians were in charge, but now it's become like every other used-to-be-indigenous land in the States--unloved and uncared for. Don't ask for sovereignty unless you're willing to a) give up everything the white man brought and b) take care of your freaking aina. Yeah, no more Mecca Wal-mart, no more SUVs or Hummers, and sure--no more diseases, but no more medical care. Nope, you have to go back to canoes and loincloths. That's what sovereignty should mean.

And, of course, I will get lynched for saying this, because of my skin color. If I were browner it would be fine for me to say something like this, but because of my heritage I'm being an "ignorant racist cracker".

I'm not racist, but I do see what's going on, and yes, I do make generalizations based on what people tend to do. White people nowadays have an almost guilty air about them (the decent ones anyway--I'm not including the KKK in this generalization), as if they need to make up for what their ancestors did. So they fling themselves into Greenpeace and Maui Peace Action and cultures that don't belong to them, trying to make up for the mistakes of our past by holding on to what we almost destroyed, while indigenous people embrace the culture of the very people that raped, pillaged, and took whatever they had. And we continue to take it--white people are just that---white until written on. We're ambiguously European--we lack any real culture. Just a melting pot of everything else. So we latch onto whatever else we can find. A lot of kids here in Hawaii choose Japanese culture. I've chosen Mayan. And then we try to keep the traditions of our "chosen culture" alive in order to make up for the thousands of cultures we've destroyed.

Most of the hippies---the ones who have rejected taker capitalist culture--in Paia are white, whereas when I go to Wal-mart I see that 70% of the customers there are local. What's wrong with this picture? You ask for sovereignty, but if given back your land what would you do with it? I walk past your house and see ten dead cars on the lawn which has no green on it whatsoever and a brand-new SUV in the garage with flowerpots that grow dirt and cigarette butts, and I'm supposed to support your cry for sovereignty? I sit at school and I watch almost all the students throw their recycling in the trash, and I'm supposed to believe you care that damn much?

Sure--hate me for being white, for saying what you don't want to hear, for seeing the goddamn truth--hate me for all these things. But in the end, who's caring for the aina? You or me?

When you can answer that satisfactorily, then you will have true sovereignty--because that's what it is. Taking care of your land. That's what a [good] sovereign did. That's what we need to do.

3.17.2006

v-clipse

V for Vendetta completely eclipsed anything else that may have ever been important. My entire life is now bound to that movie, to that idea, to that concept--to the memory of V.

No movie I have ever seen even comes close to measuring up to V. It filled me with hope--something I avoid feeling--for humanity, that maybe we'll survive. Maybe the impending doom of totalitarianism will not crush our spirits, wink out our flames, one by one by one by one.

It was set in England but speaks so clearly of what could happen to America in the very near future. There were scenes that sent chills down my spine for the very present truth shown in them.

And Hugo Weaving is such an amazing actor that I could sense his facial expressions even though all you see of him is a mask.

I will go back to see it again and and again and again and again until I run out of money, and then then when it is out I will need it so fiercely, so wholly, that I would not be complete without it.

I would sell my soul for this film.

Phantom restored my faith in filmmaking. V restored my faith.

3.04.2006

fat can be fit

One of my big pet peeves...scratch that. Not a pet peeve. Something that irritates the fuck out of me is this new 'obesity epidemic'. Let's pity fat people because it's a disease, but they're still worthless human beings because they can't control it. That's like blaming someone who has hereditary cancer because it's "her own fault".

I'm so mad I could spit, so I'm not going to be coherent if I rant on this. Instead, read the article below by Courtney E. Martin to see exactly what I mean.

America is allegedly in the midst of an obesity epidemic, but our obsession with weight is the real disease.

If you watch any mainstream news, you know that apparently America is in the midst of an obesity epidemic. Fear-producing news segments feature footage of overweight men and women, cut off at the heads like criminals, lumbering along the streets in Anytown, U.S.A. Ads with skinny women touting weight loss miracles as they look disdainfully at old pictures of their fatter, sadder selves run on a continuous loop on daytime television.

The scare tactics are working. Americans continue to pump billions, and blood, sweat, and tears into their "body projects," convinced that if they are fat, they are doomed.

Conflating fat with sickness is a dangerous delusion. The truth about fat, reinforced recently by a $419 million federal study involving 49,000 women, is that it does not automatically indicate unhealthiness. Many thin people, who don't exercise or eat balanced diets, are at a greater risk for disease than those with some extra padding who work out and eat relatively right. Your health can only be improved by movement and moderation. That's it. The study, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association last month, concludes that low-fat diets do not, despite all of the hype, reduce a woman's risk of cancer or heart disease.

Being fat is not equivalent to being unfit. In fact, being underweight actually kills over 30,000 Americans a year. Equating weight loss, instead of lifestyle changes, with improved health is "like saying 'whiter teeth produced by the elimination of smoking reduces the incidence of lung cancer,'" argues J. Eric Oliver, author of Fat Politics: The Real Story Behind America's Obesity Epidemic. Even a group of CDC researchers admit that "evidence that weight loss improves survival is limited."

So why do highly educated, media-savvy Americans continue to buy into the idea that the thinner one is, the healthier and happier one is? The mammoth diet industry, not to mention the exercise, beauty, fashion, and cosmetic surgery industries, certainly has something to do with it. In America, alone, we spend $40 billion annually on diet products, even though diets prove to be ineffective 95 percent of the time. Not only is our stupidity disturbing -- those stakes wouldn't even lure the drunkest of Vegas gamblers -- but the implications are foreboding.

There is a slippery slope from dieting to disease, as the 7 million girls and women suffering from eating disorders in this country will attest. Thirty-five percent of those who diet go on to yo-yo diet, dragging their bodies through a cycle of weight gains and losses far more unhealthy than just being overweight; 25 percent of those who diet develop partial or full syndrome eating disorders. Mindfulness advocate Susan Albers writes: "The dieting mindset is akin to taking a knife and cutting the connection that is your body's only line of communication with your head." There is little hope for long-term health improvement with this vital line severed.

Cut off from our ability to listen to our authentic hungers, we ride a roller coaster of marketed cravings and emotional upheaval -- overeating, then guiltily undereating, then overeating again. But unlike brief and thrilling amusement park adventures, we can't seem to get off the ride. The explosion of coverage on "the obesity epidemic," though well-intentioned, has not served as the emergency break nutritionists and doctors so hoped it would. Instead, the sensational news spots on the dangers of obesity have often fed misperceptions about the direct link between fat and unhealthiness, or worse, fat and unworthiness.

Hyperbolic reportage on the expanding waistlines of America's children, in particular, has created a damaging hysteria. Fat camps are flooded with applicants who are solidly within their recommended body weight. In 1995, 34 percent of high school-aged girls in the U.S. thought they were overweight. Today, 90 percent do. And those who really are fat, and yes, there are many, are subjected to increasing scrutiny and scolding. The fat kid in school, once the butt of mean jokes, is now the target of a societal assault. A recent survey of parents found that 1 in 10 would abort a child if they found out that he or she had a genetic tendency to be fat.

We are being brainwashed by sensationalistic news segments and the 250 ads we see a day that tell us, not only that fat is unhealthy, but a sign of weak character. In a recent poll by Ellegirl magazine of 10,000 readers, 30 percent said they would rather be thin than healthy. Over half the young women between the ages of 18 and 25 would prefer to be run over by a truck than be fat, and two-thirds surveyed would rather be mean or stupid. The single group of teenagers most likely to consider or attempt suicide is girls who worry that they are overweight.

The messages are coming in loud and clear, and they are riddled with disempowering dichotomies -- all or nothing, feast or famine, disgustingly fat or virtuously thin, deeply flawed or triumphantly perfect. There is no talk of what Buddhists describe as "the middle path," no discussion of the pleasure of walking, eating homemade food, slowing down. There is no permission to say "no" sometimes and "yes" sometimes, and have those no's and yeses be simple answers, insignificant scores on a Scrabble board, representative of nothing more than a mood. Instead our yeses and no's signify our desirability, our life expectancy, our self-worth.

It is not fat itself that is unhealthy, but our hypocritical attitudes and compulsive behaviors that are. We drive two blocks to the grocery store and then spend 20 minutes circling the parking lot so we can get a close spot. Once inside we load up our carts with low-fat, microwave meals and diet shakes filled with artificial everything. In the checkout line, we read about the latest fitness trend in Men's Health or Self, then get back into our cars, drive the two blocks home, and sit in front of the television all night eating Pizza Hut while drinking a liter of Diet Coke. We go to bed late, wake up early, head to work -- in our cars, of course -- where we will spend the next eight hours stationary and bored. Rinse. Repeat.

We don't need expensive, genetically engineered foods or state-of-the-art exercise equipment. We don't need fancy doctors or pharmaceutical drugs. We don't need the latest diet craze book or even the latest medical study -- they all seem to contradict each other anyway. We don't even need Herculean willpower.

We just need to leave our cars in the garage, stroll down to the park, and play some softball with our neighbors on a Saturday. We just need to enjoy every last bite of our home-baked birthday cakes, then have some oatmeal for breakfast the next morning. We need to resist the pressure to overwork and underenjoy. If we want to live long, healthy, happy lives, then we need to stop believing the hype. We need to rediscover our own wise instincts that know far more about well-being than a whole country of experts.


Source: AlterNet